Mummadi Chandramouli v. Bus Stand, Jagtial Town, M.R. Jagtial, Karimnagar District
Case at a glance
- Bench
- N V RAMANA
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in trying to lay a Road in the land of the petitioner to an extent of 178.3/4 Sq. yards in Sy.No.434/D of Thippannapet Village, M.R.Jagtial, Karimnagar District, without recourse to procedure known to law and without following procedure under Land Acquisition Act is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 300- A of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.V.NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Court made the following : Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR}
O R D E R:-
following The petitioner’s main grievance is that the respondents, without paying any compensation and without the procedure contemplated under the Land Acquisition Act, are trying to lay a road through the petitioner’s land in an extent of 178.3/4 square yards in S.No.434/D situated in Thippannapet village, M.R.Jagtial, Karimnagar District. When this matter is taken up for hearing, the learned standing counsel for the learned Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings, on instructions submitted that the respondent are not going to lay any road in the petitioner’s land Since the respondents are said to be not laying any road, no orders need be passed in the writ petition, and the same is accordingly closed. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 19th January, 2009
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.