SOUNLI BEGUM v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMU NALLAMOTHU Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR SERVICES-lll The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR TIIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.la206 of 2026 Date: 16"06.2026 Between: Sounii Il'gurri . . . Petitioner AiJiJ 'l'irc Starc o1'1'c'1anq:rn:r. l?cp. b-r ir.; [)r'incip:r] Scr:rctan to Cior cr-nmcnt. I:inancc I)c1;:rrlnrcii'. :rnd oihers. ...Respondents ORDER.: iicirrcl \,1r. RarnLr Nall:-rr-rrothu. learned counscl lbr t.tre p()tiirone r', lcarr-rccl r\ssistltnt Gcr t'rnnrcnt I)lcadcr lbr Scrviccs-T]l app,::rring tirr rhr: rcspon<1r'iri-* irncl pcruscrI thr: rn:rtcrial on rc'corcl . \\iitlr thcir colrs('nt. Lhis Writ [)clrtron is takcn r:p lor dispt-rsirl at thc stagc ot aclrnissiorr irsr'll
#2. Lcarr-rcd cournscl iirr thc llctitioncr subnrrts Lhat rhc pt'ritioncr lilccL thc insLarrr Writ I)ctitron clueslronlng thc ircLion oi'thc rcsponcl cr rts in not i'clcasirrq tlrc petrt roncr's rctirai .-!- 1tcl.,'1,'.. tir -:ti,, l r::lrJ)i',: ilr,, ir,q llll'('iI( \ bt'r'tl rltislrl llr lli(. I-r':l)Oltt (,11 itrli.t,,. i';,,: lr)i- i) t\ 1l)r'l-r- ()i llL(l illngLttll.' 1la',:fbll' (r ill( l)('t1'rl llc
#3. L,r'rtt tt( rl c rLl11:rt' 'rtl'
11.(' o('1it1orlct- li.irther sLlllnlits thal Lht' /i.s rr ri-t'cj irl lhr: lrl ( :'alll \\ r ir l)eLtljol-' hrts illrca(l\ llcrltl (lr)t.lr 1 111 llcn,'h of l)', ,stil:r r Le'c I I rrrljLrc \r, .l i-, \', ir s riist>os'-'rI oi L rrlc rrt-rJl'r t,::'-t'rl /rl '\( 1r r,/1 I ll' arl r) l)ll:-:- ,l l:illllllrr ol-ai( l- ill lil( 4, ;1i-ll( 1l s;:rri,,'rr ijr;,,.'1 ttncttl Pit'r,lcitlr filr Scn'icr'-s III ctrrl noL ai i. l)r-t1( tl.t 1-.Lll)|.ts,.iir)lts llt:1(ir' bl lt'arnr:t1 cotLIls('l lilr- thi: ri,r ,, rrr :r,l1r ,-c1 lo rlrt' tl,: D,r:::Ll of \\t.l).lio.2.l 13'C of .1025 ilalI'tl .1 ('a il-,t I "ltl s rL:irl thI tcsllolldcrnls \\ ill l-('ieasc ,rll !)a ir tr)l('n n',tr)l)cfs :l1laL l)l-,1',{,1 :il: ( ) ll-r 1' ir 1-r;, 11t. i. ri {t r r,-rli'i.s 5 I ',.r:r- : c lal ri lirl rLrrri r trtir.d(' sLll)mission's allcl ft)1- lht' i-(': I s a i_l t't 1 :c ol-li, l' (l;i1('(i
0.r 09 .)02-r Dits.-<ccl lt'''- tl-rc t) r - ( ,r \\I \c, 23138 ,rl 202i. rhis \\ rit I)cLition is drsposcci of cl ircciirrg thc rcspondcnIs to cnsurc Lhat the cnLire arnount p:rvl, rble to ti-rc peLitioncr rs rclcascd as cxpcd itrousL_r,, AS possiblc, pre l'crabl-r. rvithin a period ol six (6) tr'crc'ks I\-ont rodar. larLlinq r,,'1r ir Ir. ,.lri' cntrrc arnount *,ith r-cgarci Lo Lir. reiirari be ncl-its slrlll clrr-\ jn LcrcsL al Lhc ratc of 1O'., pcr ann Lll'n. ironr t)rc clarc Llrr' aLnr().ir-:l lr'll clurc. Lill tlrc- a1( LLrail alirtc ol rLs pa-\'rncIl t \lisr:r'llarcor-rs pcritiorls prrrLin{. i1' anr. in this \\trit i)c-'titiou, shall stand closcd. 'l-lrcrr' shall bc no order :rs to cosls //TRUE COPY// SD/-M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1 The Principal Secretary Ambedkar Telangana Secre
#2. The Director o Hyderabad. ECTION OFFICER to Government. Finance Department, Dr. BR tariat, Hyderabad, State of Telan gana f Treasuries and Accounts, lnsurance Building Abrds
#3. The District Treasury Officer, Adilabad Adilabad District 4. The Sub-Treasury Officer, Adilabad Adilabad District 5. One CC to SRt RAMU NALLAMOTHU Advocate [OpUC] 6. Two CD Copies PSK Ils {7r \_- HIGH COURT DATED: 16t06t2026 CC TODAY ORDER WP.No.18200 ot 2026 E ST4 IF 1tt c !) 2 s JUtl2U26 , o * Dps,'A'c * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS. . \) \ ,'.) l r, r"L
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 16 Jun 2026. The bench was K SARATH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.