Gopal Reddy v. A.PS.P.D.C. Limited
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
respondents 1 and 2 and with their consent the writ petition is disposed of at the
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction (S) essentially in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in not finalizing the bills pertaining to the work undertaken by the petitioner herein by Agreements No.3, 4, 5,6,10,11,12 and 13 entered in to with petitioner by the respondents herein and consequently direct the respondents herein to finalize the bills of the petitioner herein pertaining to the works undertaken by him by Agreements No.3,4,5,6,10,11,12 and 13 entered in to with the petitioner by the respondents herein. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KARNAM RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: MR.M.SREERAMULU REDDY Counsel for the respondent No.3 : None appeared The Court made the following :
ORAL ORDER:
Operative part
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and with their consent the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitioner contends that his bills are not being finalized and though he had approached the respondents and submitted representation dated 1-3-2005, no orders have been passed thereon. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 1-3-2005 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. _________ 24-6-2005 To: 1 The Chief Managing Director, A.PS.P.D.C. Limited, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Lakdi-ka Pool, Hyderabad. 2 The Director Of Fincance,A.P.S.P.D.C. Limited, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Lakdi-ka Pool, Hyderabad.
Two C.D. copies 4. The Liquidator, Kadiri Rural Electricity Cooperative Society Limited, Kadiri Town, Anantapur District
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: respondents 1 and 2 and with their consent the writ petition is disposed of at the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.