G.Sunanda, Wo lndrakaran Reddy v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Having regard to thc abovc made submissions and for the reasons alike in the order dated 03.O9.2025 passed by the Division Bench ol this Court in W.I'].No.23138 of 2025, this Writ 3 Pclition is disposed ol directing the respondents to ensure that tht. cnt…
Judgment
and PRC Arrears (12 Bills) amount of Rs 2'25'590/- sanctioned vide different token numbers dated 07 11 2025, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI' G MALLIKARJUNA SARMA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES lll The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.17809 of 20126 Date: 12.06.20126 Between: (i. Su n:rn 11r AND Thc. Statc ol 'lclangaina. tlcp b1-i_ts I,r-int:ipai Sccrotary to (iovernment, l-'inancc Dcp,a1-1qg61 an cl oLhcrs ORDE R: ...Petitioner ...Respondents Services-lll Iir'ar<J liri (). Marlir<ar.1una Sarma, Icarnec counser ror the pctltlo.(.r :rrd i.arncd Assistant Go'crnmcnl plcader .rr rrppearing for thc rcspondcnLs arrd pt:ruscd the matr.rilLl on r.c.corrl Witlt thcir consont, this Writ I)cLition ]S takcn up lor rlisposal ar Lhc s[agc of admission itself. 2, l-carnccl counscl lor thc petitioncr submits that thc questioring thc action rc lcas ing thc pctitioncr,s retiral p.tltron('1 i'i iL.,l Ll, (. tnst:rnt Wri f I1:tition of thc rr:spondcn ls rn not ) benefits, dcspite tokcn numbcrs having alrcady b<:cn raiscd by the respondent authorities lor payment of the amounts pallable to tlrc pctilioncr
#3. Learned counsel for thc pcLitioncr Iurthcr submits that ttrc lis raiscd in the prcsent Writ Pctition has already been adjudicatcd by the Division Bcnch ol this Court in W.P.No.23i38 of 2025, which n'as <lisposed of uide ordcr datcd O3.O9.2O25, and thus prayed to pass a similar order in the prcscnt Writ l)ctition also
#4. Learned Assistalt Government l)lcadcr for Scrviccs-lll did not disputc the submissions made by learned counsel for the pctitioncr with regard to thc disposal of W.P.No.23138 of 2025 dated 03.09 .2025 and submits that tl-re respondr:ni"s w'ill rcl<:asc the amounts on a priority basis of the token numbers and praycd this Cor-rrt to pass approprir.rtc orclcrs
#5. Having regard to thc abovc made submissions and for the reasons alike in the order dated 03.O9.2025 passed by the Division Bench ol this Court in W.I'].No.23138 of 2025, this Writ 3 Pclition is disposed ol directing the respondents to ensure that tht. cnt irr. jnt()un1 piLr atrli to ttto pctitioner is relcased as expeditiourslr as possrblc. prcfcrablv rl'lthrn a pcriod of six (6) \r,ccks lft>m today. failing lvilich, thC entrrc amount wrth regard to thc r('tir-itl br'ncfits shall ('arn' intcrcst al tht: rate ol 1O7o per annum. from thc datc the amount fcll duc, till aclual dlrtc o1- "hc its pavmi:nt \lisct'lletnc'ous pctiliotrs pcnding, il any, in this Writ Pclition. sh:rll stand closcd. Thcrc shall bc no ordcr as to costs. SD/.A. SREENIVASA REDDY ASSIS ANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// s CTION OFFICER To,
#1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Telangana State Secretariat, Hyderabad.
#2. The Regional Joint Director, Women Development and Child Welfare Department, Warangal
#3. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Telangana, Hyderabad. 4 The District Treasury Officer / Assistant Director of Treasuries, Kamareddy, Kamareddy District
#5. Sub-Treasury Offrcer, Yellareddy, Kamareddy District 6. One CC to SRI G MALLIKARJUNA SARMA Advocate [OPUC] 7 Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES lll, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabao [OUT] 8 Two CD Copies BM BS CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 1210612026 ORDER WP.No.17809 of 2026 ( /g J o a) )) 1l' -; SI4 16, 2 r JUN 2026 2 -6) * r(-9 I.J DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 0 J,I I,t ld.a
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 23 Jun 2026. The bench was K SARATH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.