P.Jayender Rao & Anr. v. Special Officer & Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceilings, III Floor, Chandra Vihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Judgment
Cause title
Counsel for the Petitioners:
Sri Keshav Hulsurkar. Counsel for the Respondent: --- This Court made the following:
ORDER:-
This Writ Petition following substantive relief:
… to pass an order or orders particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the orders passed in File C.C.No.F2/1148/76 dt: dt: 24.6.1982 on the file of the Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad (in the light of the observation made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in State of A.P. Vs Audikeshava Reddy as reported in ALD (6) 2001), as bad, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and unenforceable and further declare to set aside the same including the Auction sale proposed by the HUDA on 10.12.2001 in respect of Land Bearing Sy.No.526/2 admeasuring 2,195 Sq.Mts situated at Alwal Village, Malakajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as per the Public Notice published in Deccan Chronicle English Daily, dt: 11.11.2001, in the interest of Justice
. The petitioners filed WPMP No.25178 of 2009 seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition to enable them to pursue their applications for regularization in terms of G.O.Ms.No.747, dated 18-6-
Operative part
2008. At the hearing, Sri Keshav Hulsurkar, learned counsel for the petitioners, made a request for granting permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. Accordingly, WPMP No.25178 of 2009 is allowed and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.31729 of 2001 is dismissed as infructuous. -------------------------------- ---- C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:11-9-2009 MNR
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 11 Sep 2009. The bench was C V NAGARJUNA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.