M/S. BNR STONE CRUSHER v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In ,, icw of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, in
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Considering the pendency of revision petition filed by the petitioner before respondent No.1, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.l to dispose of the revision petition hled by the petitioner dated 27.02.2026 challenging the impugned proceedings issued by respondent No.3 vlde No.708/AMG/RR/…
Judgment
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particulady one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the action of the Respondents more particularly the Respondent No.'l herein in not disposing of Revision Petition filed by. the Petitioner on 27.02.2026, challenging the proceedings No.2506/AMG/RR/2017 Dated 17.01 .2026 issued by the Respondent No.3 wherein rejected the renewal application made by the Peritioner for grant of quarry lease by withdrawing the Letter of lntent bearing No.Lol/R/RGR/0028 Dated 17.06.2022 and attempting to disposes the Petitioner without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, in violation of Principles of Natural Justice, without jurisdiction, contrary to the Mines and lt/inerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and r.s. Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 and in violation of Artictes 1a, 1 9(1 Xg) and 21 of the constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the proceedings No.2506/AMG/RRy2017 Dated 17.01.2026 issued by the Respondent No.3 in withdrawing the letter of intent bearing No.Lol/RyRGR/o028 Dated 11.06.2022 pending disposal of the Revision petition filed by the petitioner herein and direct Respondents not to disposes the Petitioner from the property without following due process of law. |.A.NO:1 OF 2026 Petition Under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to srAy of all further proceedings pursuant to the proceedings No.2506/AMGiRR/2017 Dated 17.01 .2026 issued by the Respondent No.3 in withdrawing the Letter of lntent bearing No.LoI/R/RGR/0031 Dated 17.06.2022 issued in favour of the petitioner including not to disposes the Petitioner from the property without following due process of law. Counsel for the Petitioner : MRS p.VtJAyA LAKSHM|, COUNSEL REPRESENTING SRl K.PRADEEP REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : SRI A.ANANTHSEN REDDY, AGp FOR INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 7 : SRI L.RAVINDER, AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER " a HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITON No.14748 OF 2026 DATE:04-05-2026 Between: M/s. BNR Stone Crusher AND The State of Telangana Rep. By its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others ORDER: (ORAL) ... Petitioner . Respondents Heard Mrs. P. Vijaya Lakshmi, leamed counsel, representing Mr. K. Pradeep Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. A. Ananthsen Reddy, learned Govemment Pleader for Industries and Commerce, Mines and Geology Department, appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4, and Mr. L. Ravinder, leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondent Nos.5 to 7. .-,... T 2 W.P. No.14748 of 2026 Date: 04.05 .2O26
#2. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submitted that in similar circumstanccs this Court disposed ol W.P. No.14732 of 2026 by ordcr dated 04.05.2026, and prayed to grant similar relief in favour of the petitioner herein. The said submission is not disputed by leamed Govemmerrt Pleader for Mines and Geology and leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.
#3. In ,, icw of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, in terms of'order datcd 04.05.2026 in W.p. No. 14732 of 2026, directing respondenr No.l to dispose of the revision petition filed bl the petitioner dated 27.02.2026 challenging the impugned proceedings issued by respondent No.3 vzZe No.2506/AMG,&.R/ 20t8 dated 11 .01.2026, by alfording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, rvithin a pcriod of two (2) months from today. pending disposal olthe revision filed by the petitioner, status quo, obtaining as on today, shall be rnaintained, in respect of the land admeasuring
24.90 Acres in Survey No.268 of Bandiraviryala Village, Abdullapurmct Mandal, Raaga-Reddy District. There shall be no order as to co:its. w I J W.P. No. 14748 of 2026 Date:04.05.2026 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, il any, pending in the writ petition stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/-K. BHAVANI SWAMY AssrsrANr"rv SECTION OFFICER To District. Hyderabad. State Of Telangana at Hyderabad. 1 lhe Pllgpal Secretary, lndustries and Commerce Department, Secretariat, 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGy, Govemment of Telangana, 3 THE DEPUTY DTRECTOR OF MTNES and GEOLOGy, Hyderabad. 4. THE ASSISTANT DTRECTOR OF MTNES and GEOLOGy, Ranga Reddy 5. THE DISTRICT coLLECToR, Ranga Reddy District office at rntegrated District offices comprex Kongara Karan, rbrahimpatnam Mandar, ianag Reddy District. 6. THE REVENUE D|V|SIONAL OFFICER, lbrahimpatnam Division, Ranaga 7. THE TAHSILDAR, Abduilapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 8. Two CC;s to G.p FOR TNDUSTRTES AND COMMERiS, High Court for the 9. Two CC;s to G.P FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT) Reddy District. Hyderabad. (OUT)
#10. One CC to SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl 11.Two CD Copies (Along with a copy of the order in wp.No.14732 of 2026 dated 4-5-2026 to this order) SA BS t^/ff/ I HIGH COURT DATED: 0410512026 C.C. TODAY ORDER WP.No.14748 ot 2026 os 1 ll E -r t,ri I 1 I riiiY l)l z. r:) .,1.1 ^-3 '' a-.' DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. L ) \q HIGII COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT TTYDERABAD THE HONOTJRABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITON No.14732 OF 2026 DATE:04-05-2026 Between: IWs. Telangana Rock Sand Private Limited .,. Petitioner AND The State of Telangana Rep. By its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others ORDER: (ORAL) ... Respondents This writ petition is f,rled by the petitioner seeking to declare the action of respondent No.1 in not disposing of revision petition filed by the petitioner on 27.02.2026 challenging the proceedings issued by respondent No.3 vide No.708/AMGIRR/2018 dated
17.01.2026, whereby, renewal application of the petitioner for grant of quarry lease in respect of the land admeasuring 49.80 Acres in Survey No.268 of Bandiraviryala Village, Abdullapurmet Mandat, Ranga Reddy District, has been rejected, and the letter of intent bearing No.LOI/R/RGR/0038 dated 14.07.2Q22 has been r L ) i i; i 2 withdrawn, and attempts were made to dispossess the petitioner, without following due process of law, as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 and Telangana State Minor Mineral Concession Rules I 966.
#2. Heard Mrs. I'}. Vijaya Lakshmi, leamed counsel, representing Mr. K. Pradeep Rcddy, leamed counsel for the petitioner, Mr. A. Ananthsen Reddy, learned Govemment Pleader for Industries and Commerce, Mines and Geology Department, appearing tbr resprtndent Nos. I to 4, and Mr. L. Ravinder, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondent Nos.5 to 7
#3. Leamed Government Pleader for Mines and Geology submitted that revision petition of the petitioner will be duty considered in accordance with law by respondent No.l. Further, it is stated that renewal application o[ the petitioner for granting consequential relief cannot be considered as the land which has been resumed from the petitioner has been handed over to the N 3 Telangana State Industrial Infrastructural Corporation and possession has been delivered under the cover of panchanama on
24.04.2026.
#4. The said submission is disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner and it is requested that tilt disposal of revision petition hled by the petitioner, respondent authorities may be directed to maintain, status quo, in respect of the subject land
#5. Considering the pendency of revision petition filed by the petitioner before respondent No.1, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.l to dispose of the revision petition hled by the petitioner dated 27.02.2026 challenging the impugned proceedings issued by respondent No.3 vlde No.708/AMG/RR/ 2018 dated 17.01.2026, by affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of two (2) months from today. Pending disposal of the revision filed by the petitioner, status quo, obtaining as on today, shall be maintained, in respect of the land admeasuring
49.80 Acres in Suwey No.268 of Bandiraviryala Village, 4 i\ Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed B. VIJAYSEN REDDY,J M.ay 04,2026 Note : Issue CC in two (2) days (BO) MS.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In ,, icw of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, in
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 04 May 2026. The bench was B VIJAYSEN REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.