The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented v. The Registrar, Andhra Pradesh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Judgment
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.19302 of 2001 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) The writ petition is filed by the Government of Andhra Pradesh and four others assailing the order dated 20.04.2001 in O.A.No.2461 of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, 2001 passed by Hyderabad (for brevity, the Tribunal). By the said order, the Tribunal directed to regularize the services of the petitioner in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.04.1994 and G.O.(P) No.112 dated 23.07.1997. The Assistant Government Pleader for Services brought to the notice of this Court that the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.158, dated
Operative part
28.02.2011, regularising the services of the third respondent herein. A copy thereof is placed before this Court and the same is made part of the record. Further, the observation of the Tribunal that daily wage employees have to be regularized irrespective of the fact that they have put in 5/10 years of service as on 25.11.1993 does not hold good in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in A.Manjula Bhashini v. A.P. Women’s Coop. Finance Corpn. Ltd.[1] In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) ___________________
(K.G.SHANKAR, J)
17.08.2011 KH [1] (2009) 8 SCC 431
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 17 Aug 2011. The bench was V V S RAO, K G SHANKAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.