The Deputy Director, Social Welfare, Karimnagar & Ors. v. The Registrar, Andhra Pradesh Administrative
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 17 Aug 2011
- Bench
- V V S RAO, K G SHANKAR
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Judgment
Operative part
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.18982 of 2001 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) The writ petition is filed by the Deputy Director, Social Welfare, Karimnagar District and three others assailing the order dated 13.03.2001 in O.A.No.1634 of 2001 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for brevity, the Tribunal). By the said order, the Tribunal directed to regularize the services of the petitioner therein in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.04.1994 and G.O.(P)No.112, dated 23.07.1997. The Assistant Government Pleader for Services brought to the notice of this Court that the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.21, dated 06.01.2010, regularising the services of the second respondent herein. A copy thereof is placed before this Court and the same is made part of the record. Further, the observation of the Tribunal that daily wage employees have to be regularized irrespective of the fact that they have put in 5/10 years of service as on 25.11.1993 does not hold good in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in A.Manjula Bhashini v. A.P. Women’s Coop. Finance Corpn. Ltd.[1] In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) ___________________
(K.G.SHANKAR, J)
17.08.2011 KH [1] (2009) 8 SCC 431
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 17 Aug 2011. The bench was V V S RAO, K G SHANKAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.