The Director Sainik Welfare, 2nd floor Sainik Aramghar Complex v. Sham Balah
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ABHINAND
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ,,-.-\ //TRUE COPY// SD/.M. NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR .m{'" SE FFICER To, 1 one CC to SRI…
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND,KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
WRIT PETITION NO: 17419 OF 2025 Between: The Director Sainik Welfare, 2nd floor Sainik Aramghar Complex, Plot No-10, H.No.6/901/2/2A, Surya Nagar Colony, Somajiguda, Hyderabad-500082 ...PETITIONER
AND 1 Ex. Sep Sathuluri Govinda Rao, aged 45 years, S.No. 14821 791-N, S/o.Late Sham Balah, R/O Plot No. 303, JMR Spring Avenue, M.J. Colony, Road No-2, Moula- Ali, Medchal-Malkajigiri District, Hyderabad-500040, Telahgana State. Union of- lndia, Thlough the Secretary, Government of India, Ivlinistry of Defence South Block, New Delhi- 1 1001 1. 2 2 4 The Chief of the Army Staff, integrated Hqtrs, of MoD(Army) Post DHQ, New Delhi-1 '1001 1 . The officer in charge, Sena Seva Corps Abhishek(Dakshin) ASC records (South) Bangalore-560007.
5. The Director Kendriy_a Sainik Board ministry of Defence, West Block-lV, Wing- Vll, RK Puram New Delhi-1 10066. ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records relating to O.A.No.39/2024, da1ed.28.4.2023 on the file of the Hon'ble Armed Forces Tribunal Regional Bench Chennai Circuit Bench Hyderabad and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to DOPT Notification No. 36034/5/85-Est (SCT) dated 14th April, 1987 and consequently set aside the same. I I I I i I i I I lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order dated 28.04.2023 passed in O.A.No.39/2024 on the file of Honble Armed Forces Tribunal Regional Bench Chennai Circuit Bench Hyderabad pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: GP FOR SERVICES (HOME) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERIAL OF INDIA The Court made the following:
ORDER : -
'7 THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA WRIT PETITION No.17419 OF 2025 ORDER: (l'er Hon'bte Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili) Learned Government Pleader for Services (Homc) appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition
Permission is accorded
Operative part
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ,,-.-\ //TRUE COPY// SD/.M. NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR .m{'" SE FFICER To, 1 one CC to SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR' DEPUT.SOLIC|TOR GENERIAL 5'i:Ndi{ ilidi,6,irrtt"iine Siitd oiletinsana at Hvderabad [oPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES (HOME), High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad [OUT] 2 3 BSR LS Two CD CoPies s- HIGH COURT DATED:241OG12025 ORDER WP.No.17419 ol 2025 e oe 1HE S14 O 2 0 rlJB 206 s t' 9t'S Pr' rc u r'- -l DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.