✦ Telangana High Court

R.soundarajan v. Delhi

ABHINAND, VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY3 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
ABHINAND, VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

Provisions considered

Judgment

Petition under Article 226 ol lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleasedtoissueawrit, direction, orderorordersmoreparticularlyoneinthe nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating lo order dated 28.07.2025 in oA.No./021/672t of 2021 0n the file of the central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench and set aside the same and further declare that the office order No. 294, dt. 29.07.2025 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the constitution of lndia and set aside the same and consequently direct the Petitioner to continue in service I i I I ! --rrr-- 't IA NO :1 oF 2025 Petition under section 1 51 cPC praying that ,n the circumstances stated in the affrdavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the order of termrnation issued in office order No, 2g4, dt. 29.07.2025. pend ing the Writ petrtion Counsel for the petitioner: SRI. M. SRIKANTH Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRI A. KRANTI KUMAR REDDY, SC FOR CENTRAL GOVERNMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2to4: SRI N.B. SUDARSHAN,SC FOR NIRD The Court made the fo owing: ORDER I THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.269 360F 2025 oRDER: (Per t-lon'ble Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the termination orcler' dated 29'07'2025' before the Central Administrative Tribunal

2.

Permission is accorded'

3.

Granting liberty as sought for, the Writ Petition is clismissed as withclrawn' It is made clear that if the petitiouer files O.A. before the Central Administrative Tribunal challenging the termination order, d'ated 29'07'2025' the Tribunal shall entertain and hear the same on merits and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law' There shall be no order as to costs. I I l I I l I i 1 l t, I IVliscellaneous Applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shaIl stand closed. .t ] //TRUE COPY// SD/-P. PONNA KRISHNA ASS A T REGISTRAR E TION OFFICER To, ] 9n" CC rc SRt rVl SRt :Ei?^E;ii, ffi t6[H'f +l,I?,^fl'R'f3",ti""%'l"R.ENrRAL i Y#3 33 tt[! N B SUDARSHAN, sc FoR N|RD ropuc] B IVI DC. w I HIGH COURT DATED:09 tO9t2O2S t t ORDER WP.No.26936 of 2025 "i- ,l't'o i,.) / .)_ i) .'? i :., 24 5[P zffi * ft a { DISIT,IISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS 6 \V

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments