N. Hanumantha Rao v. ORAL ORDER: (Per: GR,J)
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
sought, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’
Judgment
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR W.P.No. 7529 of 2012 Dated: 19-03-2012 ORAL ORDER: (Per: GR,J) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that there is considerable incoherence in the writ petition and therefore the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. In view of the submission, granting liberty as sought, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. No costs. __________________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM ____________________________ JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR Dated: 19-03-2012 Pvks/*
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: sought, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 19 Mar 2012. The bench was GODA RAGHURAM, N RAVI SHANKAR, GODA, N RAVI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.