Manne Srinivasa Rao v. V. Veerlankiah
Case at a glance
- Bench
- BILAL NAZKI
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
(Contempt Case under Section 2 (c) (ii) and (iii) of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 r/w Rule 5 (C) of the Rules of the High Court to punish the Respondents herein for having committed gross-criminal contempt Under Section 2 (c) (ii) and (iii) of the Contempt of the courts Act 1971 R/w. Rule 5 (C) of the Rules of High Court of A.P. under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971) Between: Manne Srinivasa Rao AND .. PETITIONER
1. V. Veerlankiah, S/o. Veeraiah, R/o.561/A Shantinagar, Guntakal, Ananthapur District. 2. Mulpuri Ranga Rao, S/o. Krishna Murthy, Occ: P.E.T. Z.P.P. High School, Vatluru, West Godavari Dist.rict. RESPONDENTS This Contempt Case coming on for hearing and upon perusing the Case and affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated: 24-11-2003, 17-12-2003, 28-01-2004, 11-03-2004, 23-06-2004 & 31-8-2004 and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of
Mr. Unnam Muralidhar Rao, Advocate for the petitioner and of
Mr. S. Satyam Reddy Advocate for Respondents. The Court made the following:
ORDER:
“List on 15/12/2004. The respondents shall be present on that date.” Sd/- P. VANA KUMARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To
V. Veerlankiah, S/o. Veeraiah, R/o.561/A Shantinagar, Guntakal, Ananthapur District. (By Speed Post along with copy of Petition & Affidavit and you are directed to be present before this Hon’ble Court on 15-12-2004 at 10 : 30 AM)
Mulpuri Ranga Rao, S/o. Krishna Murthy, Occ: P.E.T. Z.P.P. High School, Vatluru, West Godavari District. (Addressee No. 2 By Speed Post with a copy of petition and affidavit with a direction that you shall present before this Hon’ble Court on 15-12-2004 at 10 : 30 A.M)
Two spare copies.
Two CCs to the Advocate General, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad(OUT) TKK. HIGH COURT BN.J & CHSRKP.J DATE: 8-12-2004. ORDER C.C.NO. 1349 OF 2003 DIRECTION Drafted By : TKK Date of drafting: 9-12-2004 HIGH COURT BN.J & CHSRKP.J DATE: 8-12-2004. NOTE: List on 15/12/2004. ORDER C.C.NO. 1349 OF 2003 DIRETION
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.