✦ Telangana High Court · 15 Apr 2026

Smt.tt/laddela VijaYa v. TheStateofTelangana

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed SD/. M.NAGAM ASSISTANT REG R ,ITRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER nt, State of Telangana'…

Judgment

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the in action of the Respondent No.2 & 3 on petitioner representation dated 10.O2.2026 about taking steps by considering allotment letter dated 03.09.201 3 issued by the Respondent No.4 and execute a conveyance deed in respect of all that +rq-s .t : I I the open land admeasuring 170.00 Sq.Yds beside H.NO.524I; cn Plot No.267l1 of Phase-3, MAC Society, BHEL, Ramachandrapuram, Sanga Re idy dist in favour of the petitioner before 5th Respondent is wholely illegal, arbi r try and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, I , 21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently this Honourable Court,l cct the Respondent No.2 to 3 to consider the petitioner representations dated 10 C2 iLo26 and execute a conveyance deed in respect of all that the open land admeas rring 170.00 Sq.Yds beside H.N0.5245 on Plot No.26711 of Phase-3, M a I Society, BHEL, Ramachandrapuram, Sanga Reddy dist in favour of the Ietitioner before Sth Respondent by following the procedure. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circul stances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bC rleased to Direct the Respondents No. 2 and 3 to consider the petitioner representirl on dated 10.02.2026 and execute a conveyance deed in respect of all that the o r rn land admeasuring 170.00 sq. yards beside H No. 5245 on Plot No. 26711 of Fl ase-3, MAC Society, BHEL, Ramachandrapuram, Sangareddy District in favour cf tne petitioner before the 5th respondent by following the procedure, pending the able writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VSRMV PRASAD SANAK, Counsel for the Counsel for the Respondent Respondent No 1: GP FOR INDUSTRIES 6 )OMMERCE No 2 & 3: SRI M. SRIKANTH tl :DDY, Counsel for the Respondent Counsel for the Respondent STANDING C( UNSEL No.5: GP FOR STAMPS & RE( ISTRATION No.4: ------- The Court made the following: ORDER w IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA W.P. No.11255 of 2o26 15th APRIL 2026 Between: Smt. Maddela Vijaya AND The State of Telangana, and 4 others. ORDER: . . . Petitioner . .. Respondents Heard Mr. V.S.R.M.V. Prasad Sanaka, learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Industries and Commerce for respondent No.1, Mr. M. Srikanth Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 and 3 and learned Government Pleader for Stamps & Registration for respondent No.5. Perused the record.

#2. This writ petition is hled to direct the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2026 and to execute a conveyance deed with respect to the open land admeasuring 170 square yards, 2 RY,J wP 11255 2026 beside House No.5245 on Plot No.267 l1 of :rase-3, MAC Society, BHEL, Ramachandrapurarn, Sanga Ft, cldy District

#3. The case of the petitioner is that I deceased- husband was allotted the open land of 17O sr1 rare ya_rds by respondent No.4, vide allotment letter datt.r 03.09.2013 subject to the payment of Rs.4,25,O00/-. Th: said amount was paid by the deceased-Maddela Sret. Ramulu on

03.07.20 15 and 10.09.2015 for Rs.2,ii, ,.00O/- and Rs. 1,75,00O/- respectively. In spite of the zrid payment made, the land was not allotted to him. In tt e meanwhile, the original allottee, Maddela Sree Ramulu di 'rl in the year

#2021. Therefore, the petitioner, who is the wjf r of deceased- Maddela Sree Ramulu, hled the present rvrit petition seeking allotment of land as per allotmen t letter, dated

03.09.2013

#4. In the circumstances stated, the resp cndent Nos.2 and 3 are hereby directed to consrder the epresentation dated 10.02.2026 fied by the petitioner set: :ing allotment of land as per allotment letter of respond€ I t No.4, dated

03.09.2013 and to pass appropriate order s thereon, 1n \ To, 1 RY,J wP 11255 2026 3 accordance with law, within a period of four weeks, from the date of communication of the copy of this order.

#5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed SD/. M.NAGAM ASSISTANT REG R ,ITRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER nt, State of Telangana' lnfrastrcutre Corporation The Prl. Secretary lndustries and Commerce Depa Secretariat' HYderabad

#2. The Managing Director' Telanagna lndustrial . Limited, 6th Floor, Parisrama BhavJn' Basheerbagh' Hyderabad Lrd " .Resd Sanga ReddY dist

#3. The Zonal Manager, TGIIC' Patancheru Zone 4. The President, BHEL Employees Mutually Aided Co'Operative Housing No'AMC/RFl/DC o lsB l 1 2 -tio5tiio "s""r"1y Societv Ltd Co' op""tiu" iltitd' ;6 liu on coio-ni' C"na nd a t'iasar' Hvderabad-S0oo 50' iffi"?,?n#;rt*,:r*5tlE

#5. The Sub Registrar, Patancheru Registration and Assurances department' 6. One CC to SRI VSRMV PRASAD SANAKA' Advocate IOPUCI ;' B. One CC to SRI M' SRIKANTH REDDY' STANDING COUNSEL [OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION 'High " oii"i""sjna At Hyderabad' [oUT] 10. Two CD CoPies & rNDusrRrES 'Hish courtrorthe state Court for the State AN . ; I I i I t ! I { I I i I I I I l 1 I 1 I i t j j I I HIGH COURT DATED: 1510412026 cc ToDl\ r ORDER WP.No.11255 of 2026 ..-. ; .IHE S ( o o ,I * APB 2I}2$ Z $. .r.. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS U \ I I i I I I I I I 1 i i i I t 1 I I I I t t

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Telangana High Court, on 15 Apr 2026. The bench was RENUKA YARA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments