G.Balaiah v. The State of Telangana and 2 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
CRIM!NAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In the impugned notice dated 03.07.2020 issued by Tahsildar, it is mentioned as under: "In view of the above, from the requisitiori ol Sub- Inspector of police, P.S.Veenavanka, it is ctearly established that the Responden r/ accusecl having executed bond for keeping peace and…
- Para 44. The orders were passed in the year, 2O2O and, nearly 5 years have passed by. Further, the status of the proceedings in Cr.No. 197 of 2Ol9 is a-lso not known. In the said circumstances, notice dated O3.OZ.2O2O asking the petitioner to remit an amount…
Judgment
Cause title
High Court For the state of Telangana, Hyderabad
2. The Station House Officer, Police Station Veenavanka, Karimnagar District. 3. The Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, Veenavanka Mandal, Karimnagar District. ...RESPONDENT
/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Sectlon 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Notice No.C/6581/2019 dated 031O712020 on the file of the Court of Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate at Veenavanka Mandal, Karimnagar District and quash the same. l.A. NO: 2OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings pursuant to Notice No.C/6581/201 9 dated 03107 12020 on the file of the court of Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate at Veenavanka Mandal, Karimnagar District, pending disposal of the Quash Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of
Sri Y ASHOK RAJ, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri M.Vivekananda Reddy the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2 & 3. The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.STIRENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.3462 OF 2O2O
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed by tl.re petitioner questioning the notice issued by Tahsildar vide No.C/6581// 20 19.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/A- I ald Sri M.Vivekananda Reddy, learned Assis; tant Public Prosecutor lor the respondent - State. Peruserl the record.
In the impugned notice dated 03.07.2020 issued by Tahsildar, it is mentioned as under: "In view of the above, from the requisitiori ol Sub- Inspector of police, P.S.Veenavanka, it is ctearly established that the Responden r/ accusecl having executed bond for keeping peace and to ntaintain public tranquility and violated the conditions r;f bond. Therefore, in view of the above circumstances , you are hereby directed to remit an amounr Rs.50,OO0/ within (07) days from the date of receipt of notice, as per the personal bond furnished by .Fou in Cr.No. l'97/2O18 otherwise criminal action will be initiateci against you as pr the period cover:<l under the bon,l as per law. " 2
Operative part
The orders were passed in the year, 2O2O and, nearly 5 years have passed by. Further, the status of the proceedings in Cr.No. 197 of 2Ol9 is a-lso not known. In the said circumstances, notice dated O3.OZ.2O2O asking the petitioner to remit an amount of Rs.50,0OO/_ is set aside. 6. With the said observation, the Criminal petition is disposed off. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER 'l' TheJahasirdar & Executive Magistrate at Veenavanka Mandar, Karimnagar 2. The Station House Officer, police Station, Veenavanka, Karimnagar District. 3. Two cCS to the PUBLIC PRoSECU;oR, fi;;; at Hvderabad. (oUT) 4. one cc to snl v-iiHoK RAJ Advocate ropuJin 5. Two CD Copies Tpk/plp yt- I i i I I I I I I l I HIGH COURT DATED:2410212025 j ( ORDER GRLP.No.3462 ot 2020 I I I l i I I I I I I 1lt E S 14 I c o a t 1 i npn zozl 6( ? C] + { t f)6'lit'A-rc \r r-o CRIM!NAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF 3-dnb ts*,," €
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: CRIM!NAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.