✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

Balaji College of Nursing v. The Special Chief Secretary to Government, Health, Medical & Family Welfare Dept

Writ Petition No. 31603 of 2011SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU

Case at a glance

Bench
SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU

Outcome

Disposed of

In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU WRIT PETITION No.31603 of 2011

O R D E R: The petitioner – College is being run at Anantapur. Previously application was made to the respondents seeking two reliefs namely; 1) for change of management 2) for change of seat of the College from Anantapur to Madanapalli Rural of Chittoor District. The Government passed G.O.Rt.No.1569 dated

06.09.2011 of Health, Medical & Family Welfare (K1) Department permitting transfer of management of petitioner – College from Balaji Educational Society, Anantapur to Nirmala Educational Society, Madanapalli, Chittoor District and rejected the second prayer for shifting the College from Anantapur to Madanapalli Rural. Subsequently, the petitioner gave another representation dated 29.09.2011 to the 1st respondent for reconsideration of its decision for shifting the College by the petitioner from Anantapur to Madanapalli Rural. Alleging that no action is being taken on the said representation of the petitioner, the petitioner approached this Court with this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking mandamus. The Government Pleader after getting instructions reports that representation/application of the petitioner dated

Operative part

29.09.2011 is pending with the 4th respondent and it is being processed for consideration and that it will be considered soon as per high power committee guidelines. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider application dated

29.09.2011 of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and preferably within three months from today. No costs. _______________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU,J Dt.25th January, 2012 PNV

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 31603 of 2011). ← Search more judgments