Judicature Of Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2010
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION’: 1178 of 2008 Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India to revise the Order dated 08.05.2008 made in I.A. 65/2008 in OP 1575/2006 on the file of the Court of the Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the preferred against the Order of JHCBBC CUm Between: 1 A. Susheela Devi (died as per LRs. Petitioner No. 2 & 3) 2 A. Krishna Reddy, S/o Narayana Reddy, R/o 6-1-127/9, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 3 A. Sarala Reddy, S/o Shanker Reddy, R/o 6-1-127/9, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. AND ..... PETITIONER(S) 1 The Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District, at Lakdikapool. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy ( East ) Division Goshmahal, Hyderabad. 3 K. Satyanrayana, S/o late K. Anajaiah R/o 3-11-109, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad-13. 4 K. Reka, W/o K. Satyanarayana R/o 3-11-109, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad-13. 5 K. Seshank, S/o K. Satyanarayana R/o 3-11-109, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad-13. 6 K. Eshan, S/o K. Satyanarayana R/o 3-11-109, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad-13. 7 Mohammed Rustam, S/o Mohammed Hussain R/o 2-2-90/3, Amberpet, Hyderabad. 8 Mohammed Pasha, S/o Mohammed Hussain R/o 2-2-90/3, Amberpet, Hyderabad. 9 Mohammed Moin, S/o Mohammed Hussain R/o 2-2-90/3, Amberpet, Hyderabad. 10 Muneerunnisa ( died ), . 11 Meer Shahabuddin Ali Khan, S/o Meer Hasham Ali Khan R/o H.No. 553, Khilwatch, Motigalli, Hyderabad., 12 Kavadi Ram Reddy, S/o Narayana ( Respondent No. 12 is not a Necessary Party ) .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the petitioner: SRI. HARENDER PRASAD Counsel for the respondent: SRI. Y. SUDHAKAR The Court made the following Order: //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Joint collector I, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy District (East), Division Goshamahal, Hyderabad. 3 Two CD copies. 4 One CC to Sri. Harender Prasad, Advocate (OPUC) 5 One CC to Sri. Y. Sudhakar, Advocate (OPUC) HIGH COURT NVR,J DATED: 14-12-2010 ORDER CRP.NO: 1178 OF 2008 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 14 Dec 2010. The bench was N V RAMANA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.