✦ Telangana High Court

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2515 OF 2022 v. Migh

E V VENUGOPAL, JUNIOR CIVIL, PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Cause title

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2515 OF 2022 -1. Narla Venkatamma, Wo. Late Rajaiah, Age 57 yrs, Occ. House wife, 2. Parya Pushpalatha, Wo. P.Ravinder, Age 36 Yrs, Occ. House wife, H.No.19- R/o.H.No. 19-40-1, Manthani, Karimnagar Dist. (A.2) 40, Kuchirajpalle, Manthani, Karimnagar Dist. (A.4) AND ...PETITIONERS

/ACCUSED NOS.2 & 4 1 . The State of Telangana, rep , by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of 2. Narla Dhivya, Wo. Ramesh Kumar, age 30 yrs, Occ. House wife, H No.6-167, Judicature of Telangana, Hyderabad. Ramnagar, KamanpurVillae, and Mandal, Karimngar Dist-505189. ...RESPONDENT

/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for records in C.C.No.64 of 2021 on the file of the principal Junior Civil Judge, Manthani, Karimnagar Dist, and quash the same in so far as the petitioners; LA. NO: 1OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.64 of 2021 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Manthani, Karimnagar Dist,; This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and up6n hearing the arguments of

Sri V. VENKATA SUBRAMANYAM, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri E.Ganesh, Addl. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 'l and Sri T Ramachandra Rao, Advocate for the Respondent No.2; The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOTJRABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUIGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No.2515 OF 2O2:Z

ORDER:

Mr.V.Venkata Subramanyam, learned coLrnsrtl for the petitioners si)ek:i permission of this Court to u.ithriraw the Criminal Petition. Learned counsel endorsed the sam,,: on the bundle

2. Permissrc,n as sought for is accorded.

3. AccordirL6gll. this Criminal Petition is disrnir; sed as '"r,ithdrawn Miscella, eeo -.rs Petitions, pending if any, shall stiend closed. //TRUE COPYII n 1 SD/. K. AMMAJI PIJTY REGISTRAR qE / SECI'ION OFFICER

1.

The Judiciar Firs;t Ctass Magistrate, Manthani, Karimnagar [)istlct 2. The station Ho -se officer, i;;;;orr'i;.'i.,'i;"ooapali Distri,:t I 315 33 3 3[l i]I]ff, re su;i;fuo"N'.iAM Adv.ocarerc, pucl li*;ffi :BEt',i;BHt??tt?&T8',tmirfili.,".t,,;;,, 'j To, VSMigh l I I I I I HIGH COURT DATED:1 8 102't2025 -aa: - :-:= :- -\ 1'1' .. ._ir { O 2 E liitl Z t D ,,6., .Vft ! .:, -az ' .6 ,+ , ORDER CRLP.No.251!i of 2022 DISMISSING T'HE CRIMINAL PETITION AS WITHDRAIIVN

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments