B.Narasimha Reddy v. B.Kavita Reddy
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, ABHINAND KUMAR SIIAVILI
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecutron' No
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ss. 96, 151
Judgment
Cause title
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HoNouRABLE sMr rt!L.. T'RUMALA DEVI EADA APPEAL SUIT NO: 751 0F 2005 AppealfiledunderSection1goftheFamilyCourtsActRywSection96of C.P.C., against the Judgment and decree dated 19-9-2002 in OS M' 242 of 1*)9 on the file of the Hon'ble Judge, Family Court, City Civil Court' Hyderabad' Between: B.Narasimha Reddy, S/o. Veera Reddy Agariculture worker Fl/o' H No' 1-1 KarkalPahad (V) Aamangal (ft/ ) APPELLANT AND B.Kavita Reddy, W/o. B.Narasimha reddy Housewife Fl/o' 17-1-383/M/3' Manohar Nagar Colony Santoshnagar RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 2 O F 2OOs(ASMP. N O: 2588 OF 20 05) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the common ludgment and decree dated 19 09'2002 passed by the Hon'bleJudgeoftheFamilycourt, CCC,HyderabadinOSNo'24211999' l.A. NO:2 oF 2009(ASMP. NO: 684 oF2009) PetitionUndersectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition, the HighCourtmaybepleased.to directtheRespondenttopaythearrearsfromMay.2003to2T-12-2005tothe Petitioner, in the interests of justice- LA. O:1OF 200 A MP NO:2373 F 2005 in the affidavit fired in suop-ort ;,y:ili: Ji,""f.ilnoote a s sn Petition under section_151 .cpc praying that in the circumstances stated tne peiitio'n, ih"'Hisn court may be preased to ^i;;I;;#iijEo",no o , ,+z or rdge on the -or ^o 1 Counset for the Appeilant : SRI p SRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: 42g9lC RAGHU The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SIIAVILI AND HON'BI E SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA A.S.No.751 OF 2005
JUDGMENT:
Operative part
(i',' Hon'bte Si luti" Aht'ndat Kantr 'f t'diI) Despite the matter being listed today under the caption "for dismissal", there is no represenrarion on behalf of the appellant. Fbnce, this Crurt has no other oPtion except rc dismiss the Appeal for non- Prosecutron. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecutron' No costs. To, Mscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed' //TRUE COPY// SD/- A.V.S.PRASAD OEPUTY REGI SECTI FFlCER I I I i
The Judge, Family Court' City Civil Court' Hyderabad 2. One CC to SRI P SRIDHAR RAO Advocate [OPUC]
One CC to SRl. C RAGHU Advocate [OPUC]
Two CD CoPies HIGH COURT DATED:13t03t202s I o 2 2 stP 2[6 ORDER AS.No.751 of 2005 DISMISSING THE APPEAL
6.gd"L
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecutron' No
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — ss. 96, 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.