G. Anthony Joseph v. University, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
WRIT PETITION NO.801 of 2001 Between: G. Anthony Joseph S/o G.Yesaiah R/o 4-30, Chinmaya Nagar, Anantapur. AND ..... PETITIONER
1 The Convenor, ECET(FDH)-2000, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad. 2 The Vice-Chancellor, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati. 3 The Commissioner, Admissions, Technical Education, Govt of A.P., Posnett Bhavan, Boggula Kunta, Hyd. .....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to allot a free seat to the petitioner for B.Tech (Mechanical Engineering) course under BC-C Category forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.R.PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.1:
Mr. K. Rathangapani Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Operative part
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _______________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 14.06.2005 Nsr // TRUE COPY // ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Convenor, ECET(FDH)-2000, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad. 2 The Vice-Chancellor, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati. 3 The Commissioner, Admissions, Technical Education, Govt of A.P., Posnett Bhavan, Boggula Kunta, Hyd. 4 Two CCs to GP for Higher Education, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 5 Two CD copies
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.