Hanamkonda District v. Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
\ /ith lt- is direction, this Criminal Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Ha,rirrry rr:gard to the submissions and the nature of alleged offences, s ttbier:t to the petitioners' appearance throu-qh their counsel on every ,a Jtlurrment and the petitioners' personal appearance as and when drrected by the Court, the personal presence of the petitioners in the…
Judgment
Cause title
PetitionUndersection52SofBNSSprayingthatlntheclrcumstances stated rn the lr/emorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pf"r""O to Quash the Criminal proceedings against the petitioners in C C No 2-030 Zt ZOZ1 on the file of Principal iunior Civil Judge -cum- Judrcial tvlagistrate of First Class at Hanamkonda, in the interest of justice r.A- NO: 1OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr'P'C praying that in the circumstances StatedintheMemorandUmofGrouMsofCriminalPetition'the HighCourtmaybe io grant stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the ;i;;.; Fetitioners ,n"c.c.ruo-iogo o1 2024 on the file of Principal Junior civil Judge - cum Jroi"irt li4agistrate of First Class at Hanamkonda' pending disposal of the Crimrnal Petition, in the interest of justice' Grounds of Crimital pr:titio This Petiti:r cc)ming on for hearing, upon perustng ther [\rlsrn9r2n6u, a1 : :;:1?$ fliJ ;i,ljl.ll 3l,T:ilI,;:llll K u D KALA, A d ! c ( re ; -il"T:,ffi.,: of the Responde, rt r{o. I and None appeared for. tte nespondeflt Nc. 2. The Court made th(-. following: ORDER l I l I I I I l l THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N. TU(ARAMJI CRIMINAL PETIT]O N No.3739 ot 2025
ORDER:
I I I This petition is filed seeking quashrnent of the C.CNo.2030 of 2024 on the file of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-.Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Hanamkonda, against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3.
Heard Mr. Harikishan Kudikala, learned counsel for petitioners and tvlr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State.
The petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3 in C.C.No- 2030 of 2024 for the offences under Section 341, 324' 506 r/w 34 of IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that though the petitioners are resolved to face the proceedings, their presence before \ the trial Court on each adjournment is causing severe hardship and effecting their employment. Therefore, prayed for dispensing their ( t personal presence unless it is requked for the proceedings and such direction would appease their difficulty.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that there is no specific obiection for the prayer, howerrer urged for a direction, for in 2 person prrlsenoe of the petitioners in the material slages of the proceedirrg l;
Operative part
Ha,rirrry rr:gard to the submissions and the nature of alleged offences, s ttbier:t to the petitioners' appearance throu-qh their counsel on every ,a Jtlurrment and the petitioners' personal appearance as and when drrected by the Court, the personal presence of the petitioners in the procere.drngr; of the C.C.No.2030 of 2024 on the file of learned Principal J-rrior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of F:irst Class at Hanamkoncrir, ir; dispensed with. Additionally it is specified that any lapse in :hiding the above conditions would render this order ineffective. 7 \ /ith lt- is direction, this Criminal Petition is disposed of. Misc:l anr-.ous petitions, pending if any, shall stand r.;losed. Sd/. P. CH. NI\GABHUS //TRUE COPY// n PEF,UTY REGISTRAR J S,:CTION OFFTCER HAMBA To, t Judge_cum_Judicial Magistrate of Firs;t Class, at 'l . The Princrp: I J ur rror Civil Hanumakorrrj r ; iii i.ii!: I i "'iy; ":"?::i I I e F'ub rrc Prosecutor Hish c;r; ?;;h; 5"tl, Lt r 5. TwO CD C,f r)rlrs o SM/gh ? i:i F: Ilisi.,.fl x,trfi",?{f.1i"ffi5: on wa ra n s a D is, "hnsrnr HIGH COUIFIT DATED: 1910312025 ORDER CRLP.No.3i3Sl of 2025 fri,, ; t') It -- \! -a: B 145f 0,1 ,run ffi .2^ z a \ .tt. /,. - 1 (:E r\\ \-' * ,T C,H EO DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION 2\ a)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: \ /ith lt- is direction, this Criminal Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.