Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ABHINAND, ABHINAND KUIVTAR SHAVILI, XXVI ADDITIONAT, CHIEF
Provisions considered
Judgment
Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 1910112021 in ARB O.P No. 03 of 2021 on the file of XXVI Additionat Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Between:
Ch. Satish Chakravarthy, S/o Sri Narshimha Rao Chennupati, R/o HIG 38, Housing_Board Colony, Near New Bus Stand, Jadcherla, Mahabubnagar District, Telangana-509301
Ch.Krishna Kumari, Wo Sri Narasimha Rao, Chennupati, R/o HIG 38, Housing_Board Colony, Near New Bus Stand, Jedcherla, Mahaboobnagar District, Telangana -509301 ...REVISION PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS AND Nirmala Devi, Wo Sri. Kailash Chand Kedia, Age.65 Years, Occ. House wife, R/o H.No.5-9-22153, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad-63, Telangana State ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of order dated 1910112021 in ARB O.P No. 0312021 On the file of XXVI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad during pendency of petition. Counsel for the Petitionersi: Sri M Achuta Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Sri T. Ranjit Singh The Court made the following: ORDER t I \ HON'BI,E SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUIVTAR SHAVILI AND HON'BLE SMTJUSTICE TIRUMAI-A DEVI EADA C.R.P.No.59l of 2021 ORDER 1l ,r I lon'bk .\i Julm thknand kmur -\'hdui/i) V4ren the matter is taken up for hearing, Ieamed counsel appeanng for the petitioners had informed this Court that the cause in this revision does eot survive for adjudication. In view of the said submission, the Gvil Revision Petition is -'lismrssed as in{mctuous. No costs. Misc,,:llaneou petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/. A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To
1. The XXVI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad 2. One CC to Sri Ir/. Achuta Reddy, Advocate [OpUC]
One CC to Sri T. Ranjit Singh, Advocate [OPUC]
Two CD Copies VH/PR@ HIGH COURT DATED: 1210212025 ORDER CRP.No.591 of 2021 e lttr- SI4 r{: c 5 C (J 'r 1z qPs Ztzs ? t .,o r6 r*.))_ .+ t I i I I I I I I j I I i t DISMISSING CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS q e5
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.