Yedla Rajendra Naidu & Ors. v. The APSRTC & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAMESH RANGANATHAN
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Constitution of India despite the vehement submissions of Sri T.S.Venkataramana, learned counsel for the petitioners, to the contrary, leaving it open to the petitioners, if they chose, to avail such other remedies as are available to them in law. The Writ Petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________ 12-02-2007
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 21738 of 1997).
← Search more judgments