Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Kanaka Durga Builders, a Partnership firm having its Registered Office at 3-4-255, Kanakadurga Bhavan, Kachi guda, Hyderabad. Rep. by Kanaka Durga.
Smt. Kanaka Business, Durga, Wo P.Ramak4ishna Srama. Aged 57 years, Occ
Smt.H. Sujatha, Wo H.Anjaneyulu. AgQd about 39 years, Occ: Business, The Petitioners No.2 & 3 are R/o C/o 3$-255, Kanaka Durga Bhavan, Kachiguda, HYDERABADS9O 027) , ...Appellants/Defendants No.1 to 3 AND 1 Smt. Us ha S.Pandit, Wio late S.V. Paqdit, Aged 83 years, Occ: Landlady, R/o FIat Nos. 6A, 6C & 6D; Kanakadurga Apartments, Hardikar Bagh, Himayathnagar, Street No.6, Hyderabad 29. ...RespondenUPlaintiff 2. P. Ramakrishna Sarma, S/o late Ramachandra Shastry, Aged 61 years, Occ. Business, R/o C/o 3-4-255, Kanaka Dutga Bhavan, Kachiguda, HYDERABAD 500 027. ...RespondenUDefendant No.4 Counsel for the Appellants : SRI A SUDER$ HAN REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI MANJA$, I S GANU The Court delivered the following: Judgment I I i I ! I I i I i I i i i THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL No.29 of 2003 JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed by the appellants, aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated28.02-2002 in O.S.No'381 of 1998 on the file of the leamed XI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court' Hyderabad (Fast Track Court).
2. Leamed counscl fbr the appetlants had not given details of the appellants who expired and had not taken any steps lbr bringing the LRs of the deceased respondent No l on rccord, as such' the appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to costs' As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending in this appeal' if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/- K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR Lt"+- SECTION OFFICER To, Court) (With records, if anY) l.TheXlAdditionalChiefJudge, CityCivilCourt, Hyderabad(FastTrack 2. one ii to sat A SUDERSHAN REDDY, Advocate [oPUC] 3. One CC to SRI MANJARI S GANU, Advocate IOPUC]
Two CD Copies ADK/gh HIGH COURT ) DATED:1 310312025 JUDGMENT .,/ f at- st ,///,' ,- .a'.' \ " € o. CCCA.No.29 of 2003 i., 21 I|JE 2$25 ( I t ''t : r'.a,- ' DISMISSING THE CCCA FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS 4,n ls/z ,/1t
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.