Judgment · High Court

t"ction 151 cf9 grying that in rhe circumstances srated :fliii#ttr*ii*fi r'#ffi i:',"r;:ly#:*.ryffi Counsel for the Appellants : THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondents 2 to 4 : SRI S. LOHITH counser for the caveat petitioners : sRr cH. ',RNACHANDRA RAO Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.p.C., aggrieved by the Judgment and 'vt vr zuut on the fite of the Chief Decree dated 1-5_2009 made in O.S.No . 107 of 2O0l Judge, CityCivil Court, Hyderabad Between: lE r "$H5,,iqhi'BthH3e#T,i:[,,'5f,x"',,',Tx,#L'ff ts$?,ss:J,",,0,{ 2' rqj e et, e q n q trq e ti o n e ! rq r e, chintagutt-, Hrna'irion-ci;, ili#;fi?LYlldr"ct, Div No 6, K c campus, gtlff l Lffunfn'r ?rn klTi; r 3. The Executive Engineer,, SreIru bi ffi s a o a. p p AND APPELLANTS 1 . M. MOHAN RE-DDY,.SO_MAJIGUD4:I.IYDESABAD, _venratapqtni nioov iJ3fff; fdfi".r.,!y'',:-t-iiip H"vo"'i6ii'r;JrT!??#:;;LlfAld,:l.u.i#*i:,ixp,.t*""ilt3ii"ilJUla,, b"riiu' uonan-ce.iiv, iri ENgg CONtTACtOTS

Mrs. M. prathin 3 i-isi'iio,'fif i,X3:Bl,H'S,!i,t Hr[?|S:.["SSJ Br1i,ffi]lr*/o H No 8. H;S"ffi5:g:',fi"r:,iliff .Y,""t:t TEBBr.Blil"Fi *,, H No 8=2=334/30, 4' Mrs' M'Nitya Reddy, w{q.!,Lr.rshavardhan Reddv Business R/o. No 547 'Yqrvrrqrr r\Eurerv Du"rtress K/o' No' 5rtl' Annasalai, Chgnnai - 600 018. RESPONDENTS * 3- l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(GCCAMP. NO: 404 OF 2009) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the decree and judgment dated 1-5- 2009 made in O.S.No. 107 of 2007 including E.P.No. 96 of 2009 on the file of Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above appeal. counsel for the Appellants : THE ADVoCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondents 2 to 4 : SRI S. LOHITH Gounsel for the Caveat Petitioners : SRI CH. PURNACHANDRA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : SRIAMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO: 130 OF 2009 : Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 1-5-2009 made in O.S.No. 106 of 2007 on the file of the ehief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Between:

The state of Andhra pradesh,, Rep. by secretary, lirigation Department, Government of Andhra pradesh, secietariat gutoingltJnr:auno Rd4- Z Tlg S-uperintending Engineer- Sreeramsagar Project, Godavari Valley Circle- 3' The Executive Engineer,, sreeramsagar project, Div. No.S/GCv-lv, H.No. 5_ lV, LMD Colony, Karimriagar District. 9-149, KishnapuralHanamkonoa, Wiiingar o'iJi. -'' ' AND APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS

1. M.Mohan Reddy, Engg. Conkactors, Hyderabad. Rep.by its prop Sri M.Mohan Reddi, slo. "venriti'pafliil:;'0,, ,.q;iitjJ"rT+s years, office at Frat No. 308, ManjaiiAprrtmenti,"sdmalrguoa, Hyderabad _ SOO 4g2. 2' Mrs. M.Prathima Reddy,.wo. Late M.Ivrohan Reddy Business R/o. H.No. g_2_ ' H,:3Xi'"i:B*iiB,'f,:: H,H[ilI:gBbB5;1i:; f/o 334t30, Road No.3, ailiiiia uiiG,lvo"i-rolo'-'s6o'o5l rn p l H No B-z-334t30, H;"gi:llrS#?#:WJB &Irrshavardhan Reddy Business R/o. No s47, .. RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS o 4- l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(CCCAMP. NO:409 OF 2009) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the decree and judgment dated 1-5- 2009 made in O.S.No. 106 of 2007 including E.P.No. 93 of 2009 on the file of Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above appeal. Counsel for the Appellants : THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondents 2 to 4 : SRI S. LOHITH Counsel for the Caveat Petitioners : SRI CH. PURNACHANDRA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : SRI AMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT ,)j THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. IUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA C.C.C.A.No.122, 129 & L30 OF 2009 COMMON MENT: (Per tlon'ble Sri |ustice Abhinand Kumar Shavili) \ \ When the matters are taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleader rePresenting learned Advocate General appearing for the appellants has informed the Court that the subject matter of the appeals has been settled between the parties rtide Memo, dated 04.10.2010, and in view of the same, the appeals may be closed.

2. Sri Hemendranath Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representirg Sri S. Lohit, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, did not dispute the said fact.

In view of the same, this Court is of the considered view that all the appeals can be closed with an observation that the parties have settled the subject matter of the appeals uid.e Memo, dated

04.10.2010.

Accordingly, all the appeals are closecl rvith the aforesaid observation. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Applications, If any, pending in these appeals shall stand closed SD/. A.V.S. PRASAD DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// i U i OFFICER To,

1. The Chief .ludge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. 2. One CC to THE ADVOCATE GENERAL, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRl. S. LOHITH, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI CH. PURNACHANDRA RAO, ADVOCATE (OPUC)

One CC to SRl. AMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA Advocate [OPUC]

Two CD Copies ASzuPSL W HIGH COURT DATED 3arc7l202s JUDGITIENT CCCA.Nos. 122,129 & i3O of 2009 CLOSING THE APPEALS -k EHT s T4 (J 2 5 l{0tt 65 * * EO