Janjanam Venkateswarlu v. The Special Tahsildar, (Land Acquisition), 2nd Road Bridge
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Therefore, the Appeal is dismissed for default
Judgment
Cause title
Counsel for the Appellants:
Sri I.Srirama Murthy Counsel for respondent: Sri T he Court made the following
JUDGMENT :
Operative part
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.2285 of 1998 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) Yesterday, when the matter came up for hearing, as none appeared for the appellant, it was listed to today under the caption ‘’For Dismissal’. Even today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, none appeared when the matter is called. Therefore, the Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. ________________ V. ESWARAIAH,J _________________ K.S.APPA RAO,J DATE:02-12-2011 T HE HON'BLE MR JUST ICE V ESWARAIAH AND T HE HON’BLE SRI JUST ICE K.S.APPA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.2285 of 1998 DT .02-12-2011 GRK
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Therefore, the Appeal is dismissed for default
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 02 Dec 2011. The bench was V ESWARAIAH, K S APPA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.