Subhash Chandra Agarwal v. District
Case at a glance
- Bench
- N V RAMANA
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take necessary action includings preventing un-authorised occupation and tress-pass by the respondent No. 4 and his henchmen and agents ect., in the land admeasuring ( 3 ) acres ( 6 1/2 ) guntas equal to ( 1.27 1/2 ) hectors in Sy.No. 167/A, situated at Malegaon Mandal, Bhainsa, Adilabad Distrcit, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.H.C.UPADYAYA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 8954 of 2008 Order: The petitioner by filing this writ petition is seeking injunction against respondent No.4, who is a private respondent. The petitioner cannot be allowed to convert the proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India into civil proceedings before a Civil Court and seek injunction against private party. If the unofficial respondent is trying to interfere with his possession, his remedy is to approach the competent Civil Court and obtain necessary orders. The writ petition is not maintainable and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 23.04.2008 Ksr/Nsr
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.