Shaik Mastanbee v. Kanigiri
Case at a glance
- Bench
- C Y SOMAYAJULU
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 226
Judgment
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction the 1st declaring the passing the action of resolutondt.3.7.2002cancelling the authorisation of the petitioner as 2nd signatory for cheques for utilisation of JSY funds of Kanigiri Gram Pnchayat as illegal, arbitrary, null and void and unreasonalble and violative of the Article 14 of the Constitution of India and violative of principles of natural justice. respondent Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.V.SESHA SAI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : WRIT PETITION NO.13649 OF 2002
Operative part
O R D E R S r i P.L.Narasimha Rao, Advocate, representing on behalf of Sri.A.V.Sesha Sai, Counsel for the petitioner, states that the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 20TH FEBRUARY, 2008 PGS ------------------------------------ JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU W.P.NO.13649 OF 2002 20th FEBRUARY, 2008
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.