Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 16 Sep 2004
- Bench
- N V RAMANA
Outcome
Dismissed
Pleader for Transport, the writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Even after passing over the matter to 2.15 p.m., none appears for the petitioners nor is there any representation on their behalf. The learned Government Pleader for Transport submits that the writ petition is filed on a mere apprehension and there is no cause of action in it. Recording the said statement of the learned Government
Operative part
Pleader for Transport, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Dated: 16th September, 2004. Ak/Svv _______________ N.V.RAMANA, J ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Regional Transport Officer and Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Cuddapah District.
The Circle Inspector of Police, Rayachoti, Cuddapah District.
Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Transport, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T).
Two CD copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Pleader for Transport, the writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 16 Sep 2004. The bench was N V RAMANA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.