M/s. Anjaneya Roller Flour Mills v. The Area Zonal Manager (D) & Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrestructure Corporation
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 10 Dec 2004
- Bench
- GODA RAGHURAM
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Rep. by Director Mr. Inderchand Prajapath, S/o Kannayyalal, Industrial Estate, Vizianagaram AND The Area Zonal Manager (D) & Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrestructure Corporation Ltd., Industrial Estate, Vizianagaram ..... PETITIONER
RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, order or Direction, declaring the action of the respondent authority in issuing Notice bearing NO. APIIC/IALA/IE VZM/PT/04, dt 28-02-2004 demanding Rs. 1,80,632-40 Ps. towards surcharge along with Destraint Warrant dt 23-03-2004 as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and is against the principles of natural justice and norms of the public policy and contrary to the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965, and to set a side the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent: MR.R.SUBBA RAO (Standing Counsel) The Court made the following :
ORDER:
Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner desires to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ 10-12-2004 NOTE: Issue C.C in two days. B/o. To
The Area Zonal Manager (D) & Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrestructure Corporation Ltd., Industrial Estate, Vizianagaram
2.2CD copies
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 10 Dec 2004. The bench was GODA RAGHURAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.