P. Sai Reddy v. The Commissioner, Kukatpally Municipality, Ranga Reddy District
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 13 Sep 2005
- Bench
- B SESHASAYANA REDDY
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 s. 345(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date: 13th September 2005. BSB
Judgment
This writ petition has been filed by P.Sai Reddy questioning the proceedings C.O.No.TPS III/78/2004 dated 17.11.2004 issued by the Commissioner, Kukatpally Municipality, Ranga Reddy District-respondent.
During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the order impugned in this writ petition as provided under Section 345 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965.
In that view of the matter, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition giving liberty to file an appeal as provided under Section 345 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965, within 30 days from the date of order. Status quo granted on 16-12-2004 shall continue till presentation of the appeal.
Operative part
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date: 13th September 2005. BSB
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 — s. 345(1).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 13 Sep 2005. The bench was B SESHASAYANA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.