✦ Telangana High Court · 21 Jan 2026

Venkata Krishna v. The State of Telangana, Through Pubitc Prosecutor. High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad

SREENIVAS RAO, USIICI3 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

1.

Venkata Krishna, S/o.S D.Venugopal. Aged about- 55 Years Occ' Govt. Employee, Rlo.2-23211, Vanr Nagar lV Street Ir,4alkajgrri R.R.District. 2 Smt. Srilatha, Wo.V.Ramanujarn Aged about- 46 Years, Occ- Prtvate Teacher, R/o Shamirpet Village and IVlandal. R.R District. 3 S Krrshna Prasad, S/o.Late S Pandu Ranqam. Age about 46 Years. Occ- Employee, R/o.H.No.29-1430, Kakatiya Nagar. East Neredmet, Malkalgiri, R. R. District.

4.

G Narayanaswamy, S/o.Venkata Narsaiah, Aged about 35 Years. Occ - Employ-ee, RIo.2-23211, Vani Nagar. IV street. IValkalgrri R R District. 5 Smt.sortha Basham lt/adhavr, W/o Venkata Krrshna, Age about- 46 Years, Occ- Govt. Employee, R/o.H.No 29 1430 Kakatiya Nagar, East Neredmet, Ivlalkalgiri, R R District.

6.

Smt.sannidi Hymavathi, S/o.S.Krishna Prasad, Age about 44 Ye-ars, Occ- Housewife, R/o.H.No.29-1430, Kakatiya Nagar, East Neredmet, lMalkajgiri' R R District. 7 Smt.sortha Basham Sridevi, W/o G Narayana Age about- 43 Years Occ- Private Teacher, R/o H.No 29-1430, Kakatiya Nagar, East Neredmet, lvalkalqiri' R R District ...pETrroNERS 1 To 7/AccusED 'r ro 4 & 7 To 9 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Through Pubitc Prosecutor. High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad.

2.

Venkatayogi Ramanuiam, S/o. V Laxmi Narsaiah Aged abort-^42 Years, Occ- R tV.P, R/o.H.No. 1-131, Shamirpet Village and Mandal, R R District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated tn the lVlemorandum of Grounds of crimrnal Petition, the High court may be pleased to call for the records pertaining to C.C No.3 of 20'1 8 pendlng on the file of Ilonble XXI l\,4etropolitan N/lagistrate, cyberabad at /edchal and quash the same as berng qross abuse of process of law and.pastr l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition irnclerr Sectron 482 of cr.P c.prayrng that I tlle circtttrstances stated rn the lvler:.1,:rr.ilun- of Grounds of Criminal Petitior tre lltglr Cotrrt maY be pleasecl to stay all irrrther proceedings pertarning to c . l'Jo 3 2018 pendtng on the frlo of l-lonblo XXI t\,4etropolrtan tt/agistrate, cyberrr ird at lvledchal and pa ss fh s Petttlon 66rtrittg on for heartng, upon perLrsin'3 re [Ienlorandulll oi Grounds of Ct rI[r:tl Petition and Llpon hearing the ar; 1]lerlts of Sl\,/1T' t) VENKA I t AKSHI\41 Advocate for the Petrtioners and Sri \ tvekananCa Reddy Asst Public Proser..r-ttc, rr or behalf of the Respondent No .lnd none appearecl for the Rcspondent No 2 The Court made the following: ORDER IN ]'HE HIGH COUR'T F'OR'tHF], SI-ATE OI' TELANGANA AT IIYDERABAD THI,] HONOURABI,FJ, SRI .'USIICI., J.SITEENIVAS RAO CI{IMIN.\L PEl'l IION No.58 of 2021 Date:21.01.2026 Between Venkata Krishna and six others 'f he Statc of Telangana, 'fhrough Public Prosecutor, I Iigh Court oflelangana. I Iyderabad and another ANI) Petitioners Rcspondents ORDER When the matter was taken up for considcration oli

05.01.2026, there was no reprcsentation for pctitioners. To give one opporlunity, posted the mattcr to 08.01 .2026. On09.01.2026 also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners either in physical mode or virtual mode. To give one morc opportunity, the matter was posted to 21.0 1.2026 under the caption "For Disrnissal. " -III 2

2. 'loda_v also thcre is no representation c r bchalf o I the petitioncrs. cither in physical rnode or virlual nr, tle, lhough thc mattcr is listcd undcr the caption 'For Disrliss:rl tt altpears that the pctitioncrs are not having intercst in proscc r ing the nrattcr. l-lencc. this ('our-t has no option cxcept to disur ss tlris petition lbr non-prosecution l. ,\ccor.clinglr,, thc Crinrinal l)etition is c isnrissed lbr rlon- ploscc Lltron (-'onserluent lv. ntisce llaneous applications. I an1,, pending shaI stand clis rn issccl ,SD/- A. JAYASREE ASS I ;TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The XXI lVletropolitan l\rlagrstrate, Cyberabad at Medch;r 2. The SHO PS Shanrirpet, Cyberabad 3. OneCCto SN4T DVENKATLAKSHtJll Advocate[OPll ) 4. One CC to ASSI PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, Advocate [: F UC] 5. Two CD Copies GEiPSL HIGH COURT DAf ED:211O112026 ORDER CRLP.No.58 ot 2021 i 1 ( t t.! ir l 1 r(' "'t t.:\ /tl2fi OF.SmT -) :. I 2() \ * DISMISSING THE CRLP AS NON PROSECUTION -JKS 2-(), I I,)-

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Telangana High Court, on 21 Jan 2026. The bench was SREENIVAS RAO, USIICI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments