R.Venkateswar Rao v. Society, Nalgonda
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 08 Dec 2004
- Bench
- B PRAKASH RAO
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing proceedings RC.No.76/2003-B, dated 13/10/2003 for recovery of amount, without conducting the enquiry under sec. 51 of APCS Act, as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the judgments of this Hon'ble Court and set aside the impugned surcharge order dt. 13/10/2003. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.R.TAGORE Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. FOR COOPERATION AND G.P. FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following :
ORDER:
Operative part
Heard both sides. Admittedly, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition as against the surcharge proceedings Rc.No.76/2003-B dated 13-10-2003, against which regular appeal is provided under Section 76 of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964. In view of the above, I do not find any justification to entertain the Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal within a period of four weeks from today raising all the grounds available to him and the same shall be considered and disposed of on merits, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from today. It is needless to observe that the impugned orders need not be given effect to for a period of four weeks from today. No costs. Dated 08-12-2004. SKMR ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J. ..... REGISTRAR To 1 The District Cooperative Officer, Nalgonda. 2 The Divisional Cooperative Officer Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Society, Nalgonda.
2CCs each to G.P. for Cooperation and G.P. for Agriculture, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad, (OUT).
2CD copies
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 — s. 76.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 08 Dec 2004. The bench was B PRAKASH RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.