MANSUKHLAL KALIDAS VITHLANI v. STATE OF GUJARAT & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
The petitions are disposed of as withdrawn
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Consequentially, Civil Applications also stands disposed of as withdrawn. PD Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. (MAUNA M. BHATT,J)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6804 of 2016 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR JOINING PARTY) NO. 1 of 2016 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6804 of 2016 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR JOINING PARTY) NO. 1 of 2018 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6804 of 2016 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6805 of 2016 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR JOINING PARTY) NO. 1 of 2016 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6805 of 2016 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR JOINING PARTY) NO. 1 of 2018 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6805 of 2016 ========================================================== MANSUKHLAL KALIDAS VITHLANI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ========================================================== Appearance: MS.DILBUR CONTRACTOR(6388) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MS NALANDA D ACHARYA, AGP for the Respondent No. 1 MR AMAR D MITHANI(484) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 1,3 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MAUNA M. BHATT Date : 04/11/2025 ORAL ORDER
#1. Learned advocate for the petitioner upon instructions, requested to withdraw these petitions. Permission as prayed for is granted. The petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. C/SCA/6804/2016 ORDER DATED: 04/11/2025
#2. Consequentially, Civil Applications also stands disposed of as withdrawn. PD Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. (MAUNA M. BHATT,J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petitions are disposed of as withdrawn
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 04 Nov 2025. The bench was MAUNA M BHATT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.