✦ Gujarat High Court · 14 Feb 2001

KISHOR UPENDRANATH SHUKLA v. STATE OF GUJARAT

Civil Application No. 12335 of 2000S K KESHOTE

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- RAJIV @ KISHOR UPENDRANATH SHUKLA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR HR PRAJAPATI for Petitioner MR SAMIR DAVE AGP for Respondent No. 1, 2, 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE…

Judgment

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================

1.

Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO

3.

Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- RAJIV @ KISHOR UPENDRANATH SHUKLA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR HR PRAJAPATI for Petitioner MR SAMIR DAVE AGP for Respondent No. 1, 2, 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 14/02/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT The learned counsel for the respondents is in agreement that this matter is squarely covered on one point by judgment of this court in the case of Ranubhai Bhikhabhai Bharwad (Vekaria) v. State of Gujarat & Ors., reported in 2000(3) GLR 2696, and only on this ground, this order of detention of the petitioner vitiates. In view of this concession made by learned counsel for the respondents, this petition succeeds and the same is allowed. The order of detention of the petitioner dated 20.10.2000 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, Ahmedabad, under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Antisocial Activities Act, 1985, detaining the petitioner as `Dangerous Person' is hereby quashed and set aside and the petitioner - Rajiv @ Kishor Upendranath Shukla, detenu, at present at Junagadh Jail, Junagadh, is to be set at liberty forthwith if he is not required in any other case. Rule is made absolute. No order as to costs. .......

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India; Gujarat Prevention of Antisocial Activities Act, 1985 — s. 3(2).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Gujarat High Court, on 14 Feb 2001. The bench was S K KESHOTE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 12335 of 2000). ← Search more judgments