✦ Gujarat High Court · 30 Aug 1986

MANAV SEVA SANGH v. DIRECTOR OF COTTAGE INDUSTRIES & COOPERATION OF INDUSTRIES

Civil Application No. 4879 of 1986S K KESHOTE4 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

writ petition is dismissed

Provisions considered

Judgment

CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 18/10/96 ORAL JUDGMENT (cid:9)Heard learned counsel for the respondent and perused the Special Civil Application. The petitioner, Manav Seva Sangh, filed this petition before this Court and challenged therein the order of the respondent dated 30th August 1986 cancelling the petitioner's name from the list of Government recognised women institutions. The Government of Gujarat, Industries, Mines and Electric Department, by its Resolution No.ICO 1078/4383/5, Sachivalaya, Gandhinagar, dated 8.3.79, decided to give first preference to the recognised women institutions for purchase of essential articles by the Government and Semi Government State level cooperative societies and Jail etc. It has been resolved under the aforesaid resolution of the Government that these institutions shall receive the articles mentioned in the said resolution only from the women institutions recognised by the State of Gujarat without inviting any kind of tender.

List of articles to be supplied is mentioned in the said resolution and the rates of articles were required to be fixed by the Committee of the members mentioned therein. The petitioner-institution was a recognised institution for the aforesaid purpose. Subsequently the aforesaid resolution has been modified and these women institutions were further entrusted with the work of supply of all cereals after necessary cleansing of the same, flour to the Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad. By subsequent orders made from time to time further grocery items were entrusted for the supply to different Government institutions and semi Government institutions by the women organisations. The petitioner has given out the facts in the Special Civil Application that these organisations were given the work of supply of aforesaid grocery items to different Government institutions including Civil Hospital. The respondent, by passing the orders from time to time reduced the work of supply of articles to institutions and lastly the supply of articles was restricted to only two institutions, namely, the Civil Hospital, and Maniben Hospital, Ahmedabad.

The petitioner filed the Special Civil ApplicationNo.371 of 1986 for appropriate writ or direction challenging thereunder the reduction of institutions to which supplies of articles were made by the petitioner. In the said Special Civil Application, on 29.4.86, the Court has made order with consent of the counsel for the parties that the respondent No.1 therein, the Director of Cottage Industries and if he nominates the Joint Director, the Joint Director, shall give a date of appointment to all the women's institutions which are at present supplying materials to the institutions prescribed by the Regulations. The Court further ordered that all these institutions shall submit their respective suggestions in writing and he shall formulate a policy which will ensure equal distributions of supply to all such women's organisations as far as the nature of the commodities and other relevant factors permit.

For this exercise, a time bound programme has been fixed by this Court. The report has been submitted to the Court in the previous litigation and only six women institutions were entrusted with the work of supply of articles and the recognition of the petitioner institution was cancelled. This report has been challenged by the petitioner before this Court in this Special Civil Application.

Operative part

2.(cid:9)On 29.9.87, this petition was admitted and interim relief, in terms of para-16(B) has been granted. Para-16(B) of the petition reads as under: "That pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition, the implementation of the order of annexure K be stayed and the respondent be directed to entrust the work of supply of articles to the petitioner institution" So for all these years, the report annexure `K' dated 30th August 1986 was not given effect to and the petitioner would have been given work of supply of articles to different establishments. Nobody is present today in the Court on behalf of the petitioner which goes to show that no grievance now survives, otherwise somebody would have been present today to press the Special Civil Application. In view of this fact, this writ petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. Ad-interim relief, if any granted by this Court stands vacated. No order as to costs. ....... (sunil)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: writ petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Gujarat High Court, on 30 Aug 1986. The bench was S K KESHOTE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 4879 of 1986). ← Search more judgments