VIJAYKUMAR RAMSING THAKUR & 15 v. SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & 1
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 4907 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= VIJAYKUMAR RAMSING THAKUR & 15 - Petitioner(s) Versus SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & 1 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR AJ SHASTRI for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 16. MR PRASHANT G DESAI for Respondent(s) : 1 - 2. ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT Date : 09/10/2007 ORAL JUDGMENT This is a petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the occupants of public land near Surat Railway Station. The SCA/4907/1998 JUDGMENT petitioners claim that they have been occupying the public land for several years and they carry on their business from that place near the Surat Railway Station. The petitioners assert their right to carry on business from the public land in question. They have prayed that the respondent Surat Municipal Corporation be restrained from disturbing the possession of the petitioners of the public land in question. In view of the order made on Civil Application No.12385/2007 today, this petition does not survive. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule is discharged. Subject to the order made on Civil Application No.12385/2007, interim relief stands vacated. The parties will bear their own cost. /moin (Ms. R.M.Doshit, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 09 Oct 2007. The bench was R M DOSHIT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.