B N BORSE v. FOREST CONSERVATOR
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
(cid:9)Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
challenged either the inquiry held against him, or the finding of guilt recorded against him. In that view of the matter, the order of dismissal from service does not call for interference. (cid:9)Petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. There
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: (cid:9)Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 07 Dec 1999. The bench was R M DOSHIT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 3287 of 1987).
← Search more judgments