✦ Gujarat High Court · 06 Nov 2003

DESAI BABARBHAI GANESHBHAI v. DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE

Civil Application No. 1770 of 1999H K RATHOD

Case at a glance

Judgment

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD Date of decision: 06/11/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT (cid:9)Heard learned advocate Mr. T.R.Mishra for petitioner, learned advocate Mr. A.V.Trivedi appearing on behalf of respondent No.3 and learned AGP Mr. N.D.Gohil appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 & 2.

2.(cid:9)The question raised in the present petition by the petitioner is that he has never tendered resignation to the respondent No.3. The respondent No.3 has raised the contention that resignation has been tendered by the petitioner. The petitioner has also disputed his signature and writing on the resignation against which the respondent No.3 has emphasized that the resignation is signed and written by the petitioner himself. This being the disputed question of fact, this Court cannot go into such question, therefore, better course for the petitioner is to raise industrial dispute under the machinery of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Therefore, this petition, though admitted in the year 1999, this Court is not able to examine the disputed question of fact which has been raised by the respondent No.3 and, therefore, it is open for the petitioner to raise industrial dispute challenging the termination order or resignation before the appropriate forum.

3.(cid:9)In view of above observations, present petition is not entertained by this Court and same is disposed of. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. (cid:9) (cid:9)(H.K.Rathod,J) Jayanti* (cid:9) (cid:9) (cid:9)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Gujarat High Court, on 06 Nov 2003. The bench was H K RATHOD.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 1770 of 1999). ← Search more judgments