✦ Gujarat High Court · 02 Aug 2000

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER v. PREMBHAI MURJIBHAI

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER Versus PREMBHAI MURJIBHAI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR KG SHETH Ld. AGP for Petitioners MR AJ PATEL Ld. Advocate for respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH Date of decision…

Judgment

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH ============================================================

#1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

#2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO

#3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?

#4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

#5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER Versus PREMBHAI MURJIBHAI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR KG SHETH Ld. AGP for Petitioners MR AJ PATEL Ld. Advocate for respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH Date of decision: 02/08/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT (cid:9)All these appeals arise from the impugned judgment and order dated 21.4.1997 passed in Land Reference Cases No. 528 to 536/91, 211 to 222/92, 246 & 247/92, 562 to 564/92, 613 to 622/92, 1655 to 1667/92, 1866 to 1875/92, 627 to 628/93, by the learned Assistant Judge, Bharuch. (cid:9)Heard. All the aforesaid reference cases relate to acquition of lands situated in Sulatanpura, Jaghadia, as particularised in the reference cases. The notification under sec. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act in respect of the said lands came to be published on different dates ranging from 5.10.89 to 28.6.90. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 215/- per Are ( Rs. 2.15/ per sq. mtr.) The claimants sought to the reference being made before the learned Assistant Judge, Bharuch. Upon appreciation of the evidence adduced in the reference cases, the trial court came to the conclusion that compensation was required to be enhanced by Rs. 6.70 per sq.mtr. ( Rs. 670/ per Are) to Rs. 8.05 per sq.mtr. The trial court relied upon the sale instances of thelands bearing block no. 303, situated in Sultanpura village itself. The said instance reflected from sale-deed dated 15.10.87 ex. 12 shows that the land was sold at the rate of Rs. 700/ per Are ( Rs. 7/ per sq.mtr.). The trial court appears to have considered reasonable increase in the value/price of the similar lands by passage of time. (cid:9)Mr KG Sheth learned AGP tried to submit that there are no instances from which comparison could be made with the instance placed on record of the reference cases. In fact, that ought to have been done by the appellants. The trial court has dealt with the evidence at length with regard to the value of the lands in question. Besides, the claims for compensation are quite petty in nature, in any event, they are around Rs. 15,000/ in few cases, whereas much below Rs. 15,000/ in most of the cases. Hence, in the facts of the case, these appeals are not required to be entertained and they are accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. ********* mandora/

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India; Land Acquisition Act — s. 4.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Gujarat High Court, on 02 Aug 2000. The bench was M S PARIKH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No. 6689 of 1999). ← Search more judgments