✦ Gujarat High Court · 02 Jul 1998

GUJARAT AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY v. URVASHIDEVI

AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 31 of 1998M S PARIKH2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

(cid:9)Subject to this, this appeal is dismissed with no

Judgment

CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.PARIKH Date of decision: 02/07/98 ORAL JUDGEMENT (cid:9)Admit. By consent of the learned advocates for the parties, this appeal is taken up for final hearing today. The appellant who happens to be the plaintiff in special civil suit no. 72 of 1997 has filed the said suit for obtaining possession of the land in question by virtue of section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. In that suit, the plaintiff moved an application Exh. 5 for obtaining the relief of interim injunction restraining the defendant from transferring or assigning the land in question or any portion thereof to anybody and also for relief of mandatory injunction directing the defendant to hand over possession of the land in question to the plaintiff. By the impugned order dated 2nd December, 1997, the learned trial Judge granted the interim injunction against the apprehended transfer of the suit land but did not grant mandatory injunction. That is how the appellant-plaintiff is before this Court in this appeal from order.

2.(cid:9)It is not in dispute that soon after the filing of the suit for possession as aforesaid, the defendant has also filed special civil suit no. 76 of 1997 challenging the status of the present plaintiff vis-a-vis the land in question.

3.(cid:9)Having heard the learned advocates for the parties and bearing in mind the facts and circumstances of the case, the order impugned herein cannot be set aside. However, since the suit in question is for obtaining the relief of possession of the land in question by virtue of the provisions of section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, it is obvious that the said suit has got to be decided on priority basis.

Operative part

4.(cid:9)In the result, following order is passed : (cid:9)While maintaining the impugned order, the trial Court is directed to hear and decide the special civil suit no. 72 of 1997 on priority basis as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six months from the date of receipt of these directions. It will be open to the parties to see that the special civil suit no. 76 of 1997 is also placed for hearing and disposal alongwith the special civil suit no. 72 of 1997. (cid:9)Subject to this, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to cost.

02.07.1998. (cid:9) (cid:9)(M.S.Parikh,J.) Vyas (cid:9)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: (cid:9)Subject to this, this appeal is dismissed with no

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India; Specific Relief Act, 1963 — s. 6; Specific Relief Act — s. 6.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Gujarat High Court, on 02 Jul 1998. The bench was M S PARIKH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gujarat High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 31 of 1998). ← Search more judgments