THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. The State of AP and 8 Ors
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of
Judgment
Operative part
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA Date : 11.11.2025 ORDER Heard Mr. B. Picha, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Ms. G. Ete, learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate appearing for respondent nos. 1 to 5, and Mr. K. Loya, learned CGC appearing for respondent nos. 6 to 9. By filing this interlocutory application, the applicant has prayed for condoning the delay of 10 (ten) days beyond the period of limitation in filing the connected review petition. Although the learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate and learned CGC has opposed the prayer made in this interlocutory application, considering the projection made, the Court is inclined to condone the delay of 10 (ten) days beyond the period of limitation in filing the review petition. In the meantime, the learned counsel for the applicant shall also serve requisite extra copies of the connected review petition to the learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate and CGC within 2 (two) days. Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. The connected review petition shall now be listed before the Court. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gauhati High Court, on 11 Nov 2025. The bench was KALYAN RAI SURANA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.