THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 143, 307, 326, 447
Judgment
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2983/2022 ABDUL KAYUM CHOWDHURY AND 2 ORS SON OF LATE ABDUL MANNAF R/O DAKHIN JARONI P.O. PHULTOLI BAZAR, P.S. LANKA DIST. HOJAI, ASSAM PIN-782446 2: JOYNAL ABDIN CHOUDHARY S/O LATE ABDUL MANNAF R/O DAKHIN JARONI P.O. PHULTOLI BAZAR P.S. LANKA DIST. HOJAI ASSAM PIN-782446 3: MEHBUB AHMED CHOWDHURY S/O LATE ABDUL MANNAF R/O DAKHIN JARONI P.O. PHULTOLI BAZAR P.S. LANKA DIST. HOJAI ASSAM PIN-78244 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA Date : 02.11.2022 ORDER Both sides are duly represented. Mr. Bhaskar Sarma, learned APP has submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner in connection with Lanka P.S. Case No. 269/2022, under sections 143/447/326/307 IPC vide charge-sheet no. 254/2022, dated 23.10.2022. Accordingly, the Court is inclined to close this application by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional/committal Court and apply for bail. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 143, 307, 326, 447.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gauhati High Court, on 02 Nov 2022. The bench was KALYAN RAI SURANA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.