✦ Gauhati High Court

Judgment · High Court

No. 4 of 2012C R SARMA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Bail application is disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Having heard the learned Counsel, appearing for both the parties and con sidering the evidence, collected by the I/O as well as the nature of allegations , I do not find it to be a fit case to extend the benefit of pre-arrest bail aga inst the petitioners. Hence, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is rejected. The earlier interim order dated 07.08.2012 is recalled. Return the case diary. Bail application is disposed of.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Bail application is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 147, 148, 302, 326, 341.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 4 of 2012). ← Search more judgments