Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail refused
Hence, this bail application is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 294, 448, 506
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. N J Dutta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. By this application, filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioners, n amely, (1) Sri Chandra Kanta Barman, (2) Sri Kamal Barman and (3) Sri Bhabesh Ba rman, have prayed for pre-arrest bail, in connection with Chandmari P.S. Case No . 415/2013, under Sections 448/294/506/34 IPC. As the alleged offence are bailable, the application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., is not maintainable. Hence, this bail application is dismissed.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, this bail application is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 294, 448, 506.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.