Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
the petitioner, this writ petition stands allowed by declaring that the levy of
Provisions considered
- Assam Entry Tax Act, 2001 s. 3(1)
Judgment
Operative part
Earlier only 7 items were specified for levy of tax and hospital equipments was not included amongst those items. However by Notification dated 8.1.2002, additi onal entries were made in the Schedule of the Act and according to Entry at Sl. No.13, hospital equipments of all types were made taxable under Section 3(1) of the Act. Mr. G. Baishya, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner contends th at the levy of Entry Tax on import of medical equipments was held to be unauthor ized by this Court and accordingly he prays for allowing this petition, as was o rdered in respect of similarly situated petitioners. Mr. R. Dubey, learned Standing Counsel for the department submits that b y subsequent amendment Act, the department has clarified that Entry Tax will not be levied on medical equipments in course of import from outside the Country. In view of the above submissions by Mr. Dubey and the contention made by the petitioner, this writ petition stands allowed by declaring that the levy of Entry Tax on medical equipments originating from outside the Country is not aut horized under the provisions of Section 3(1) of the Act. The demand made against the petitioner is accordingly set aside.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the petitioner, this writ petition stands allowed by declaring that the levy of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Assam Entry Tax Act, 2001 — s. 3(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.