Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
By this application under O XLI Rule 5 CPC, the petitioners have prayed for stay of the execution of the decree passed in Title Suit No. 177/02 by the l earned Civil Judge, Junior Div. No. 3, Kamrup affirmed in Title Appeal No. 97/20 05 by the learned Civil Judge Senior Div. No. 1, Kamrup. The connected appeal has been admitted and the records have been called fo r. It is stated that the petitioners are in possession of the suit land and i n the event of execution of the decree during the pendency of the appeal and in the event of allowing the appeal there would be multiplicity of proceedings and the petitioners would suffer irreparable loss. In view of the above fact situation, the execution of the impugned judgment and decree as indicated above shall remain suspended till disposal of the appea l. However, liberty is granted to the respondents to pray for modification/vac ation of this order, if so advised.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.