✦ Gauhati High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Heard Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. P.P. for the State and Mr. M. Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the accused/respondent. Perused the impugned judgment alongwith the materials made available before me. Upon consideration of the materials available on record and upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the prayer to file appeal against the impu gned judgment and order dated 27.8.03, passed by the learned Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 58/2001, acquitting the accused/respondent under S. 302 IPC, stands granted.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments