THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The application is allowed and the Principal Accountant General, Assam is
Judgment
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1334/2024 SAJIDA BEGUM, W/O LATE ISPAKUL HUSSAIN, R/O DERGAON CHARIALI, NEAR FOREST BIT OFFICE, WARD NO. 4 PO AND PS DERGAON, DIST. GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN-785614 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6, ASSAM 2:SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 ASSAM 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ROAD) CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3 ASSAM 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KOHORA PWD ROAD DIVISION KOHORA GOLAGHAT ASSAM 5:PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 A.G. OFFICE TRINAYAN PATH KRISHNAPUR BELTOLA TINIALI GUWAHATI ASSAM-781029 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K MAZUMDAR Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. SEMA ORDER Date : 07-06-2024
07.06.2024 Heard Mr. P.K. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. R. Dhar, learned Standing Counsel, PWD. This application has been filed for impleading the Principal Accountant General, Assam, A.G. Office, Trinayan Path, Krishnapur, Beltola Tiniali, Guwahati, Assam as respondent No. 5 in the Writ Petition 1441/2018. The application is allowed and the Principal Accountant General, Assam is directed to be impleaded as respondent No. 5 in WP(C) 1441/2018. The petitioner shall file amended Cause Title and registry shall take steps accordingly. The I.A.(C) is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is allowed and the Principal Accountant General, Assam is
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gauhati High Court, on 07 Jun 2024. The bench was K SEMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.