✦ Gauhati High Court · 14 Feb 2022

ANJALI GOGOI CHARINGIA v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS

K SEMA3 min read

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Direct the respondent authority consider the application of the application dated 21.12.2021 thereby allowing her to stay at Karbi Anglong i.e. present place of posting till consideration of her application of voluntary retirement. When the matter is listed today the learned CGC has furnished…

Judgment

ANJALI GOGOI CHARINGIA W/O. SHRI MOHAN CHARINGIA, R/O. KHATKHATI CRPF CAMP, GATE NO.3, P.O. GAUTAM BASTI, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI 110001 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-110011. 3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE NORTH EAST DIVISION 9TH MILE AMERIGOG GUWAHATI-781023 ASSAM. 4:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE FORCE II CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-110011. 5:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (NES) CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE Page No.# 2/5 SHILLONG MEGHALAYA-793001. 6:THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE GROUP CENTRE KHATKHATI DIST. KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN-782480. 7:THE COMMANDANT 232 MAHILA BATTALION CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE WEST MEDINIPUR WEST BENGAL PIN-721132 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R PHUKAN Advocate for the Respondent : MR. K GOGOI Linked Case : WP(C)/5284/2021 ANJALI GOGOI CHARINGIA W/O. SHRI MOHAN CHARINGIA R/O. KHATKHATI CRPF CAMP GATE NO.3 P.O. GAUTAM BASTI DIST. KARBI ANGLONG PIN-782480 ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI-110001. Page No.# 3/5 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-110011. 3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE NORTH EAST DIVISION 9TH MILE AMERIGOG GUWAHATI-781023 ASSAM. 4:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE FORCE II CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-110011. 5:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (NES) CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE SHILLONG MEGHALAYA-793001. 6:THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE GROUP CENTRE KHATKHATI DIST. KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN-782480. 7:THE COMMANDANT 232 MAHILA BATTALION CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE WEST MEDINIPUR WEST BENGAL PIN-721132. ------------ Advocate for : MR B ACHARYYA Advocate for : ASSTT.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS Page No.# 4/5 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. SEMA Date : 14.02.2022 ORDER Mr. R. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. Gogoi, learned counsel CGC for the respondents. In the interlocutory application, the petitioner has sought for following relief:

1.

Stay the operation of the release order dated 29.12.2021 and any consequent action thereto and/or.

2.

Direct the respondent authority consider the application of the application dated 21.12.2021 thereby allowing her to stay at Karbi Anglong i.e. present place of posting till consideration of her application of voluntary retirement. When the matter is listed today the learned CGC has furnished the order dated 25.01.2022 issued by the Office of the Commandant, 232 (M) BN CRPF, Salboni Pashchim Medinipur stating that the petitioner has reported to the above mentioned office and accordingly, the petitioner has been taken on the strength of that unit/office from the date of her date of reporting. In the said order the petitioner’s name appears at Sl. 6 and her joining date is reflected as 12.01.2022. Page No.# 5/5 In view of the order dated 25.01.2022, it is submitted by the learned CGC that the I.A.(Civil) No.16/2022 has become infructuous. The learned counsel for the petitioners fairly admits that the I.A. has become infructuous and it may be closed. In view of the submission made by the parties, I.A.(Civil) No. 16/2022 is disposed off as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments