✦ Gauhati High Court

Judgment · High Court

P K SAIKIA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Bail application stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Heard Mr. MA Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. BS Sinha , learned Addl. PP for the State. Case diary is produced today by the learned Addl. PP in pursuant to the order passed by this Court. In this proceeding, the petitioner, Padmeswari Ghosh has prayed for pre- arrest bail in the event of his arrest in connection with North Lakhimpur PS Cas e No.449/2013 u/s 366(A)/34 of IPC. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the ma terials available in the case diary, I am of the view that the accused-petitione r can be granted the benefit of pre-arrest bail in connection with the aforesaid case. Accordingly, the interim order dated 22.7.2013 passed by this Court is h ereby made absolute. However, on condition that petitioner shall not interfere w ith the investigation of the case. Bail application stands disposed of. Return the case dairy.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Bail application stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 366(A).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Gauhati High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments